Summer 2011 Newsletter
Written by: Registered Pharmacist and Diabetes Educator Expert Witness No. 3591
Medication errors are a primary source of patient injury that plague our healthcare system. According to the Physicians. Insurers Association of America, in 2008, 334 claims closed with a medication error. Medication errors related to the treatment of diabetes are more common than one would like to think. This is in part due to the many facets involved in diabetes treatment from insulin administration to blood sugar monitoring both at home and in the hospital setting. Read more on this article...
Click here to view this Expert's CV
Consolidated Consultants provides FREE nationwide referrals of Expert Witness services and Medical Expert Witness services. We are focused on providing complimentary first-rate referrals of expert witness services to attorneys and insurance companies.
Monday, August 8, 2011
Sexual Harassment and Preventative Medicine
Summer 2011 Newsletter
Written by: Workplace Psychology Expert Witness No. 149
When companies consider the impact of sexual harassment they probably think of being legally defensible. Not bad thinking. But a better thought is -- why not prevent the problems of sexual harassment in the first place?
A true story
Two partners in a large consulting firm, Frank and Jessica, considered themselves friends and were notorious for teasing each other in the office. In one incident Jessica put up a picture of a bodybuilder flexing his muscles and pasted a photo of Frank’s head on it. Frank responded by putting up a picture of a girl in a bikini posing by a car and pasted her head on the picture. Read more on this article...
Click here to view this Expert's CV
Written by: Workplace Psychology Expert Witness No. 149
When companies consider the impact of sexual harassment they probably think of being legally defensible. Not bad thinking. But a better thought is -- why not prevent the problems of sexual harassment in the first place?
A true story
Two partners in a large consulting firm, Frank and Jessica, considered themselves friends and were notorious for teasing each other in the office. In one incident Jessica put up a picture of a bodybuilder flexing his muscles and pasted a photo of Frank’s head on it. Frank responded by putting up a picture of a girl in a bikini posing by a car and pasted her head on the picture. Read more on this article...
Click here to view this Expert's CV
Promissory Notes - Traps & Tips
Summer 2011 Newsletter
Written by: Real Estate Broker, Promissory Note, Mortgage Financing Expert Witness No. 83
The Trap
Although appearing relatively simple in concept, a promissory note and the accompanying loan documents can be very complex in construction. Additionally, the attorney must insure that its terms and conditions of the note and other loan documents comply with all federal and state laws. Read more on this article...
Click here to view this Expert's CV
Written by: Real Estate Broker, Promissory Note, Mortgage Financing Expert Witness No. 83
The Trap
Although appearing relatively simple in concept, a promissory note and the accompanying loan documents can be very complex in construction. Additionally, the attorney must insure that its terms and conditions of the note and other loan documents comply with all federal and state laws. Read more on this article...
Click here to view this Expert's CV
Litigation and the Bicycle

Written by: Bicycle Accident Reconstruction Expert Witness No. 76
Many of us in the bicycle industry refer to cycling as the “The new golf.” The popularity of bicycles has expanded faster than any other participant sport in America. 2010 sales figures indicate a 33.2% increase in volume from just a year ago. To put that in perspective, there are far more cyclists in America than golfers, tennis players and skiers combined. The participation profile indicates many more adults; from their mid-twenties-through their mid 60’s are now riding bikes. While a lot of us are enjoying our bicycles, we cannot forget the ever present risks. Many of the new crops of mature riders are more secure financially, so those risks are worth calculating. Read more on this article...
Click here to view this Expert's CV
Tuesday, July 12, 2011
Small Businesses Fined by the IRS Initiating Lawsuits Against Benefit Plan Advisors
Written by: Financial, Estate Planning and Retirement Expert Witness No. 3306
Click here to View this Expert's CV
Advisors and insurance brokers, for many years, beginning in the 1990s, have sold the 412(i) plan, a type of defined-benefit pension plan, and the 419 plan, a health and welfare benefit plan, to small businesses as a way of providing certain benefits to their employees, while also, and much more importantly receiving large tax deductions. Some of these plans were structured in a way that has subsequently been deemed as an abusive tax shelter.
Via legislation enacted in October 2004, Congress changed the law to address these certain tax shelters which were considered abusive and required that these companies file with the Internal Revenue Service if they had these plans in place. Contributions to these plans were described by advisors as fully tax deductible and, it was claimed, large contributions could be sheltered, especially in the early years of the plan’s life, so a significant amount of income was sheltered, possibly forever, if rolled into annuities and similar financial products. It was actually sometimes claimed that money could be contributed, as well as withdrawn, tax free. Another outrageous claim was that the amount of tax deductions was unlimited.
Until recently, the IRS had instituted a moratorium on collecting these fines. However, the moratorium ended on June 1, 2010. Many companies and financial advisors were not aware that this was a cause for concern. However, according to experts, the author of this article included, employers are now receiving heavy scrutiny from the Federal Government, as the IRS has been aggressive in auditing these plans. The fines for failing to notify the agency about them are $200,000 annually for businesses and $100,000 annually for individuals, for every year of participation in whatever plan is in question.
The IRS increasingly is issuing penalty notifications to businesses, as well as to advisors who sold these plans to small businesses or who recommended plan participation, in addition to accountants who prepared and/or signed tax returns claiming deductions for participation in such a plan. Not surprisingly, the businesses affected by these fines often resort to litigation against the advisors who persuaded them to adopt these plans, or who sold them. The situation for the businesses is bad enough, and they sue to recover, among other things, the expenses of these penalties. But it could be even worse for the advisors involved, who face not only litigation but IRS penalties as well, and perhaps even having action taken against professional licenses.
Click here to View this Expert's CV
Tags: insurance, brokers, IRS, tax, planning
Click here to View this Expert's CV
Advisors and insurance brokers, for many years, beginning in the 1990s, have sold the 412(i) plan, a type of defined-benefit pension plan, and the 419 plan, a health and welfare benefit plan, to small businesses as a way of providing certain benefits to their employees, while also, and much more importantly receiving large tax deductions. Some of these plans were structured in a way that has subsequently been deemed as an abusive tax shelter.
Via legislation enacted in October 2004, Congress changed the law to address these certain tax shelters which were considered abusive and required that these companies file with the Internal Revenue Service if they had these plans in place. Contributions to these plans were described by advisors as fully tax deductible and, it was claimed, large contributions could be sheltered, especially in the early years of the plan’s life, so a significant amount of income was sheltered, possibly forever, if rolled into annuities and similar financial products. It was actually sometimes claimed that money could be contributed, as well as withdrawn, tax free. Another outrageous claim was that the amount of tax deductions was unlimited.
Until recently, the IRS had instituted a moratorium on collecting these fines. However, the moratorium ended on June 1, 2010. Many companies and financial advisors were not aware that this was a cause for concern. However, according to experts, the author of this article included, employers are now receiving heavy scrutiny from the Federal Government, as the IRS has been aggressive in auditing these plans. The fines for failing to notify the agency about them are $200,000 annually for businesses and $100,000 annually for individuals, for every year of participation in whatever plan is in question.
The IRS increasingly is issuing penalty notifications to businesses, as well as to advisors who sold these plans to small businesses or who recommended plan participation, in addition to accountants who prepared and/or signed tax returns claiming deductions for participation in such a plan. Not surprisingly, the businesses affected by these fines often resort to litigation against the advisors who persuaded them to adopt these plans, or who sold them. The situation for the businesses is bad enough, and they sue to recover, among other things, the expenses of these penalties. But it could be even worse for the advisors involved, who face not only litigation but IRS penalties as well, and perhaps even having action taken against professional licenses.
Click here to View this Expert's CV
Tags: insurance, brokers, IRS, tax, planning
Monday, May 2, 2011
Noise: An Environmental Pollutant Demanding Greater Attention
Written by Noise Pollution Expert Witness
Spreading dirt on the cobblestone street in front of the State House in Philadelphia in 1787 protected the men inside from the noises of passing carriages and carts which would have intruded upon their deliberations as they worked on the http://www.barefootsworld.net/consti15.html document that would set down the principles by which our country would be governed. In 1972, 185 years after the writers of our Constitution recognized the intrusiveness of noise, the United States passed the Noise Control Act, designed to protect citizens from the dangers of noise. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was charged with carrying out the mandate of the Act and in 1978 stated in its “Noise: A Health Problem” booklet: “It is finally clear that noise is a significant hazard to public health.” Unfortunately, EPA’s noise division was essentially dismantled IN 1981 and today EPA is minimally involved in lessening the din of overhead planes, the loud blasts of railroad horns, and the myriad of noises engulfing millions of citizens daily.
Our federal government is essentially “out of the noise abatement” business, leaving the control of noise to cities and states. While New York City has recently updated its 1970s Noise Code and other cities across the country have passed anti-noise legislation, our country has regressed with respect to noise control and abatement. This, at a time when a review of the growing number of noise studies, many of which we cite in our soon to be published book Why Noise Matters (Earthscan, 2011), makes it abundantly clear that noise is indeed hazardous to our mental and physical well-being. Children are especially vulnerable as demonstrated by the many published articles on the adverse impacts of noise to their cognitive, language and learning skills.
Health and education costs are rising in this country and one way to reduce these costs is to abate noise which we know adversely impacts our health. What to do? Learn about the hazards of noise and urge your public officials in Washington to enforce the Noise Control Act.
Consolidated Consultants
Finding the Right Expert for You!
Toll Free 800-683-9847
www.freereferral.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)